We recommend that HUD require the City to provide supporting documentation for the 4 program participants that did not have adequate income documentation. If the supporting documentation cannot be provided, repay, from nonfederal funds, $99,347.

We recommend that HUD require the City to since the property updates have been completed for the 24 program participants that did not receive the green infrastructure training, provide documentation that any subsequent program participants completed the green infrastructure training workshop before the grant agreement is signed and construction begins.

Develop and implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that (1) staff issues notices of violation and default within 15 calendar days of the inspection report release date and (2) the Office of Multifamily Asset Management and Portfolio Oversight is made aware when notices are not issued within 15 calendar days after the inspection report release date and takes action as appropriate to ensure that future notices are issued in a timely manner.

Status

HUD has implemented a process of sending notifications to the field offices' centralized inboxes when a failed inspection has been released with instructions to issue a Notice of Default or Notice of Violation within 15 days. The field office logs this task into the Asset Management Processing System (AMPS) and assigns it to an Account Executive. Field office management tracks the progress of the task in AMPS. HUD is building a reporting tool to see if the task has been properly entered into iREMS and addresses the field office instances where it has not. The construction of this tool has been delayed due to limited staff resources. As of January 2025, the reporting tool was undergoing review and testing prior to implementation. The final action target date was November 29, 2024.

Analysis

Implementing procedures and controls for the timely issuing of notices would ensure that property owners are held accountable for correcting life-threatening deficiencies in a timely manner thus reducing the risk of families living in units that are unsafe for longer periods.

The implementation of this recommendation has the potential to directly impact the health and safety of families.

Include language in future notices of violation and default clearly stating that owners are required to inspect all units (including vacant units), common areas, grounds, building systems, and sites as part of the owner survey and require owners to include sufficient detail in the surveys to show (1) when the survey was conducted and (2) that the survey was a complete survey of the project.

Status

HUD will update the Notice of Default and Notice of Violation in conjunction with updates related to NSPIRE. These updates have been delayed by limited staff resources and pending policy clarifications and system changes for NSPIRE.

The final action target was November 29, 2024.

Analysis

The inclusion of language in the notices would ensure that property owners are aware of their responsibilities to inspect all units, common areas, grounds, building systems, and sites and perform repairs of identified deficiencies to protect families from living in units that are not decent, safe, and sanitary.

The implementation of this recommendation has the potential to directly impact the health and safety of families.

Develop and implement adequate policies, procedures, and controls to ensure that owner certifications and surveys and other relevant documents related to properties that fail inspections or are noted as having EHS deficiencies are maintained and retrievable from an easily accessible location.

Develop and implement adequate controls to ensure that HUD staff with the appropriate level of authority approves extensions to the notices of violation and default cure periods in writing and that documentation is maintained to support such approvals.

Modify the queries used to generate the schedules of properties that accompany the reports to Congress to consider a larger range of dates to ensure that properties that failed consecutive inspections are appropriately identified on all applicable schedules.

Assess and streamline the processes for preparing, reviewing, and approving the reports as appropriate to ensure that the reports are submitted to Congress on or before the required due date.

Implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that documentation is maintained to support that the reports were submitted to Congress.

Develop comprehensive guidance and training for grantees on how to prepare the PR 29 report to ensure that the information collected is reliable, accurate, timely, and in compliance with the Uniform Administrative Guidance for Grants and Cooperative Agreements, specifically 2 CFR 200.302(a)(b) and 2 CFR 200.303

Follow up with the four grantees without adequate supporting documentation and assess their compliance with the financial management requirements in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(3), which require the financial management system of each non-Federal entity to provide for records that adequately identify the source and application of funds for federally funded activities.

Update the CPD Monitoring Handbook to incorporate the review of the PR 29 report when performing financial monitoring reviews.

Develop written procedures on how to review PR 29 report submissions and monitor resubmissions, late submissions, and nonsubmissions.

Evaluate and update IDIS to ensure that resubmissions of PR 29 reports are tracked and prior submissions are preserved and correct the system’s misclassification of unsubmitted and uncertified draft PR 29 reports as submitted.

Determine how often grantees’ requests for reimbursement contain cost outside the quarter and in coordination with OCFO, evaluate CPD’s grant accrual methodology and assumptions to ensure that it adequately considers the impact of these late cost reimbursements.

Develop guidance that encourages grantees to draw down funds for reimbursement on a regular schedule, not less than quarterly.

Work with OCFO to ensure that CPD collects and reports to OCFO all of the information needed to properly account for all CPD activities in HUD’s financial statements in accordance with Federal financial reporting requirements and accounting standards.

Update Line 4 - Cash (grant funds) disbursed during the reporting period in the PR 29 report to allow grantees to report all CDBG grant funds disbursed, including funds that have not yet been drawn down from HUD for reimbursement.

Obtain the required approvals under PRA for the PR 29 report.

HUD’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO), in coordination with other appropriate program offices, should define and implement a risk-based process to assess and document IT risk management personnel resourcing needs and that those personnel are allocated effectively to support HUD’s risk management program (IG FISMA metric 7).