U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Export
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1005-001-H

    Implement additional procedures and controls to ensure that documentation is obtained to support that the limited clientele national objective was met.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1005-001-I

    Obtain training or technical assistance on CDBG program requirements.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0004-001-A

    Pursue departmental clearance for the July 25, 2013, guidance that did not go through required departmental clearance. For any items that cannot be appropriately cleared, HUD should take appropriate action to recall the document or policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0004-001-B

    Develop guidance that helps the public understand its options for assistance between CDBG-DR and SBA and how to comply with Federal requirements.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-A

    Develop and implement a written methodology for employees’ time allocations for its HUD grant programs in accordance with program requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-B

    Provide training on compensation for personal services grant program requirements to employees working on HUD grants.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1003-001-C
    $142,181
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support $142,181 spent on payroll allocated to HUD grants or repay the program from non-Federal funds.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-A
    $81,654
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide supporting documentation or reimburse its Program $81,654 from non-Federal funds for unsupported on-the-job training costs incurred under project FL0220L4D001407.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-B
    $1,023
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide supporting documentation or reimburse its Program $1,023 from non-Federal funds for unsupported personal cell phone costs incurred under project FL0220L4D001407.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-C

    Provide guidance to subrecipients to ensure that (1) on-the-job training hours are supported by source documents, such as signed attendance or time sheets, and (2) personal goods and services are supported by documents that show the allocation between business and personal use.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-D

    Report Program income of $31,724 for FL0199L4D001407 to HUD.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-E
    $15,756
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide supporting documentation to show that participant 87487 from FL0431L4D001403 was chronically homeless or reimburse its Program $15,756.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1005-001-F

    Perform onsite monitoring of the subrecipient that administered project FL0431L4D001403 to ensure that participants are eligible and annual income re-certifications are performed.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1004-001-A
    $119,046
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse NSP2 from non-Federal funds for the $59,523 in ineligible disbursements on the five vouchers.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1004-001-B
    $449,736
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide documentation to support that the $224,868 in NSP2 funds drawn down from the four vouchers was eligible or repay the program from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1004-001-C
    $6,338
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide documentation to support that the differences resulting from the payroll costs for the three vouchers, which netted $3,169, were offset in later drawdown vouchers or repay the program from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1004-001-D

    Review all administration drawdown vouchers and provide documentation to support that the drawdowns for estimated payroll costs are reconciled with the actual payroll costs for the pay periods. Any calculated overpayment by NSP should be returned to the program to meet program purposes.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2016-OE-0011S-01

    Provide clearer guidance and instruction to PL 113-2 disaster grantees to assist them in establishing an effective internal audit activity.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2016-OE-0011S-02

    Establish a recurring training and discussion forum among the PL 113-2 grantees and CPD that enables grantees to share ideas and receive guidance and information about CPD’s expectations regarding the internal audit requirement.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-0001-001-A
    $15,814,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reevaluate the feasibility of the two Section 108 activities that failed to meet a national objective and determine the eligibility of the $15,814,000 already invested. Any amount determined ineligible must be reimbursed to the program from non-Federal funds.