Certify, along with the owners of the 63 units cited in this finding, that the applicable housing quality standards violations have been corrected.
2018-PH-1002 | February 15, 2018
The Fairmont-Morgantown Housing Authority, Fairmont, WV, Did Not Always Ensure That Its Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards and That It Accurately Calculated Housing Assistance Payment Abatements
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-AOpenClosed
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-BOpenClosed$29,226Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $29,226 from non-Federal funds ($27,737 for housing assistance payments and $1,489 in associated administrative fees) for the 22 units that materially failed to meet HUD’s housing quality standards.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-COpenClosed$1,241,550Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that program units meet housing quality standards and inspectors are adequately trained to perform inspections, thereby ensuring that an estimated $1,241,550 in program funds is spent for units that are decent, safe and sanitary.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-DOpenClosed$3,822Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $3,822 from non-Federal funds for housing assistance payments that should have been abated.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-EOpenClosed$267Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Reimburse five owners $267 for the excess housing assistance payments it abated.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-FOpenClosed
Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that extensions granted to owners to make repairs after failed inspections comply with HUD regulations.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-GOpenClosed
Develop and implement controls to ensure that abatements are properly calculated and procedures in its administrative plan are followed.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-HOpenClosed
Train its staff on the proper abatement of housing assistance payments.
2018-PH-1001 | February 11, 2018
The Fairmont-Morgantown Housing Authority, Fairmont, WV, Did Not Always Administer Its Housing Choice Voucher Program in Accordance With Applicable Program Requirements
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-AOpenClosed$4,920,685Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Conduct criminal record background checks in accordance with its policies and procedures to ensure that adult members of households for whom the Authority made housing assistance payments totaling $4,920,685 were eligible to participate in the program or repay its program from non-Federal funds for any amount that it cannot support. If the participants are deemed ineligible, the Authority should follow applicable regulations to terminate or modify assistance.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-BOpenClosed
Develop and implement controls to ensure that criminal records checks are conducted, according to policy, at application and when family composition changes.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-COpenClosed$19,520Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Repay its program $19,520 from non-Federal funds for the ineligible housing assistance payments made.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-DOpenClosed
Correct the errors in the files of the noncitizen families identified by the audit.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-EOpenClosed
Develop and implement controls to ensure that it follows policies and procedures found in its administrative plan for verification of citizenship or eligible noncitizen status.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-FOpenClosed
Develop and implement controls to ensure that assistance is properly prorated for eligible family members of noncitizen students.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-GOpenClosed
Review the citizenship documentation for all adult household members residing in assisted housing and verify correct entry to applicable HUD systems.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-HOpenClosed
Correct the waiting list errors identified by the audit.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-IOpenClosed
Develop and implement controls to ensure that it follows policies and procedures to award and verify preference points for program applicants as required by its administrative plan.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-JOpenClosed
Train staff on the requirements for which it will develop and implement controls as a result of the recommendations made in this audit report.
- Status2018-PH-1001-001-KOpenClosed
Refer the Authority to the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity for a review of the Authority’s waiting list to ensure that all areas comply with HUD requirements.
2018-NY-1003 | February 07, 2018
The Housing Authority of the City of Asbury Park, NJ, Did Not Always Administer Its Operating and Capital Funds in Accordance With Requirements
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2018-NY-1003-001-AOpenClosed$1,294,062Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark Office of Public Housing require the Authority to provide documentation to show that the $1,294,062 paid to the Long Branch Housing Authority was for eligible, reasonable, necessary, and allocable costs or reimburse its Operating and Capital Fund programs from non-Federal funds for any amount that it cannot support or that is not considered reasonable.