The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
March 08, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1004
Cheyenne Housing Authority in Cheyenne, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
HUD-OIG reviewed the Cheyenne Housing Authority's (Authority) administration and management contract with Housing Operations and Management, Incorporated (contractor), to determine whether the Authority awarded the contract in accordance with federal procurement requirements.
The Authority did not follow federal procurement requirements and its own procurement policy when it awarded its administration and management contract to the contractor.…
March 04, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1004
Chapter 5 - Insured Development Cost Certification Audit Guidance
February 28, 2007
Single audit guidance
The Lusk Housing Authority in Lusk, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
February 26, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1002
The Buffalo Housing Authority in Buffalo, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
February 26, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1003
The Newport News Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Newport News, Virginia, Did Not Always Follow HUD Requirements
February 19, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1005
Oakland Housing Authority Did Not Comply with Procurement and Contracting Requirements
February 13, 2007
Report
#2007-LA-1005
The Housing Authority of the City of Evansville, Indiana, Needs to Improve Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Administration
February 12, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1003
Gwinnett County, Georgia, Subrecipients Did Not Provide Funds Required by Their Contracts
January 30, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1003
The Housing Authority of East St. Louis, IlliNis, Improperly Used Public Housing Funds
What We Audited and Why
We audited the East St. Louis Housing Authority (Authority) because of a hotline complaint alleging that Authority’s management misused U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority followed HUD’s regulations and its own policies when procuring goods and services, granting leave, and managing vehicle operations.
What We Found …
January 12, 2007
Report
#2007-KC-1004
The Marion Housing Authority, Marion, Indiana, Improperly Used HUD funds for nonprofit Development Activities
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Marion Housing Authority's (Authority) nonprofit development activities. The review of public housing authorities' development activities is set forth in our fiscal year 2006 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority because it was identified as having high-risk indicators of nonprofit development activity. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority diverted or pledged resources subject to its…
December 13, 2006
Report
#2007-CH-1001
Housing Authority of the County of Cook, Chicago, IlliNis, Had Weak Controls over Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of Cook's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2005 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon a risk analysis that identified it as having a high-risk program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority managed its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of…
September 30, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1021
SAR 56 - Semiannual Report to Congress for period ending September 30, 2006
The Inspector General Act of 1978 requires the Inspector General to prepare semiannual reports summarizing the activities of the Office of Inspector General for the preceding six month periods. The semiannual reports are intended to keep the Secretary and the Congress fully informed of significant findings, progress the Agency has made and recommendations for improvement.
September 30, 2006
Semiannual report
#SAR 56
Rockford Housing Authority, Rockford, IlliNis, Needs to Improve Its Controls over Program Housing Assistance and Utility Allowance Payments
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Rockford Housing Authority's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2005 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon a risk analysis that identified it as having a high-risk program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority managed its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban…
September 29, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1020
Saginaw Housing Commission, Saginaw, Michigan Improperly Used Public Housing Funds to Purchased Property
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Saginaw Housing Commission's (Commission) Public Housing Operating Fund program (program). We initiated the audit based on a request from the Detroit Office of Public Housing for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). We audit was also part of the activities in our fiscal year 2006 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Commission properly used its program funds…
September 28, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1018
Lower Manhattan Development Corporation Community Development Block Grants Disaster Assistance Funds
"HUD OIG performed the seventh of the ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation’s (LMDC’s) administration of the $2.783 billion in Community Development Block Grant (Block Grant) Disaster Recovery Assistance funds provided to the State of New York following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. HUD OIG’s audit objectives were to determine whether the LMDC (1) disbursed…
September 27, 2006
Report
#2006-NY-1013
The Housing Authority of the City of Passaic Section 8 and Public Housing Capital Fund Programs
What We Audited and Why
In response to a hotline complaint that the Housing Authority of the City of Passaic (Authority) was being mismanaged, we audited the Authority's Section 8 and Public Housing Capital Fund programs. We also audited controls over disbursements and costs allocated to different programs. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the allegations of hotline complaint were valid. We also determined if Section 8 units…
September 22, 2006
Report
#2006-NY-1012